Sunday, April 5, 2015

New York Yankees: Branding and Marketing and how it effects the MLB and Teams

The New York Yankees is the most recognizable team and logo in sports across the world. Whether youre in the heart of New York, across the country in Los Angeles or across the World in Japan, Asia, or Africa, everyone seems to know the New York Yankees and the interlocking NY logo. Why is that? And how have the Yankees marketed their brand and company so well?

1923 was the year that the New York Yankees started to become the Yankees who are so well known today. It was back then that “The Yankees quickly became a marketable brand, as fans flocked to see them play (over one million attended games in 1920) and they did not have to wait long for success. Players including Lou Gehrig, Babe Ruth, and Joe DiMaggio helped achieve a number of World Series titles by 1939, including four straight World Series crowns 1936–39. This success continued; the team won five consecutive titles 1949–53. Despite the 1950s proving to be another successful period, after winning the World Series in 1962, the Yankees then went until 1977 before securing another one.” The Yankees’ huge success and championship winnings back in the 1920s was also the beginning of the brand, recognition and eventual marketing of the famous New York Yankees. 

Fast forward to the 1970s when George M. Steinbrenner purchased the team and turned the Yankees, on and off the field, into the “Evil Empire.” “In January 1973, Cleveland-based shipping magnate George Steinbrenner purchased the franchise from CBS for $10 million. In 1974, Steinbrenner started a process of big spending on free agency by signing some star players who had become free agents.” Between the late ‘70s and early ‘90s the Yankees were one of the worst teams in baseball. Despite this the Yankees brand was still alive because of their previous grand history and success.

The Yankees brand and logo have become so famous that they are able to go into different industries and have their logo sell for them. Fragrance is about to enter a whole new ball game with the creation of a New York Yankees scent masterbrand. Launching at the end of April in Macy's stores in the New York metropolitan area, at Yankees Stadium and online, the men's and women's scents will later expand to additional department stores domestically and in multiple international markets, said Tom Butkiewicz, chief executive officer and managing partner of The Cloudbreak Group, of the deal inked between his firm, Major League Baseball and the New York Yankees to create the prestige fragrance duo.” The Yankees also have a smart marketing plan, for example they launched a new fragrance after winning the World Series in 2009. Once winning the World Series after a nine year drought for the team, the Yankees gained even more fans, more sponsors asmore companies wanted to do business with the team.
“Despite periods with limited on-field success, the Yankees have remained a highly marketable brand. This has only been strengthened in the increasingly globalized and commercial world in which modern sport now operates. Not only is the Yankees brand successful for the franchise; it also helps the finances of other teams in MLB.” While some Yankee-haters might never want to admit it, the Yankees are good for baseball and the league. “More than 25 percent of MLB-licensed merchandise that is sold is typically associated with the New York Yankees. The royalties then get shared evenly among the 30 MLB teams; in 2009, this totaled $433 million, with the Yankees contributing $125 million.

In more recent years since the early 2000s baseball teams have been able to make television deals with local networks, resulting in teams having more money and higher payrolls. Now this made the Yankees an even stronger powerhouse when it came to free agency. Strikinga deal with their own regional sports network, the Yankees Entertainment Sports Network (YES NETWORK), took the Yankees to a whole different levefinancially as well aswith marketing and branding. “The fledgling Yankees Entertainment and Sports Network is talking to ad agencies about its marketing needs as it prepares for a spring 2002 launch, sources said. Six to eight shops have been contacted, and the New York client will soon cut to three finalists-based chiefly on case histories and chemistry meetings, said sources. That cut could come as early as next week.” 
Other teams such as the Boston Red Sox, the New York Metsand the Los Angeles Dodgers, just to name a few, also have deals with their own regional sports networks, giving them the ability to have an influx of financial gain and compete financially with the New York Yankees. “Television money is driving the sport’s top line growth. In 2014, broadcasting and cable money accounted for $2.88 billion, or 37% of baseball’s $7.86 billion of revenue. Just five years earlier, television proceeds were $1.73 billion, or 29% of the sport’s $5.91 billion of revenue. During the past five years, mega cable deals for the Dodgers, Seattle Mariners and Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim have kicked in, and last season MLB began new national broadcasting deals with ESPN, Fox and TBS that will pay a total of $12.4 billion over eight years–more than double the previous contracts.” 
          2015 Estimated Total Payroll
1

$276,008,625
2

$215,962,857
3

$172,742,250
4

$172,666,066
5

$171,821,277
6

$162,736,157
7

$154,832,483
8

$140,901,040
9

$138,882,500
10

$124,516,300

The New York Yankees are worth the most, $3.2 billion, The Los Angeles Dodgers, worth $2.4 billion, land in second place three years after Guggenheim Baseball Management bought the team and Dodger Stadium for $2 billion from Frank McCourt. The Dodgers raked in more than $120 million in local television money last season, the most in baseball, as part of  the team’s 25-year, $8.35 billion deal with Time Warner Cable. The team also leads MLB in attendance, with 3.78 million fans coming through the turnstiles during the regular season. The San Francisco Giants had the biggest year-over-year gain, doubling in value, to $2 billion. The Giants’ three World Series titles over the past five seasons have helped the team nearly double revenue, to $387 million.” 

It’s not all good in Yankee-land! Along with the Yankees’ good publicity, recognition and fans comes bad publicityand other fans who absolutely despise the Yankees. But the list above shows the Yankees are number two in payrolls and their rivals, the Red Sox, are number four. Why so much hate and focus about the Yankee payroll? With revenue sharing and television deals, why do the Yankees still have the stigma of hatred and wealth? Other teams like the Red Sox, Dodgers, and Giants, are making the money too. How these teams among others choose to spend their money is what differs from the Yankees. I understand that small market teams don’t have the money that the Yankees do. Even so, small market teams can still be successful in the league. For example, the Pirates are on the rise and the Royals made the World Series last season, while the big evil rich empire’ is on the downfall and haven’t made the playoffs in the last two seasons.  
So why do the Yankees have such a bad and good reputation among fans and the league? What do you believe makes the Yankees brand and marketing? 







Work Cited
 McMains, Andrew. "Yanks Taking Pitches." Yanks Taking Pitches. Pro Quest- Eastern Edition, 22 Oct. 2001. Web. 5 Apr. 2015. <http%3A%2F%2Fsearch.proquest.com.libraryproxy.quinnipiac.edu%2Fdocview%2F212682883%3Fpq-origsite%3Dsummon>.

"MLB Team Cash Tracker." Http://www.spotrac.com/mlb/cash/N.p., n.d.Web.<http%3A%2F%2Fwww.spotrac.com%2Fmlb%2Fcash%2F>.


Naughton, Julie. "Yankees' New Pitch: Fragrance Masterbrand." Yankees' New Pitch: Fragrance Masterbrand. Pro Quest, 17 Feb. 2012. Web. 5 Apr. 2015. <http%3A%2F%2Fsearch.proquest.com.libraryproxy.quinnipiac.edu%2Fdocview%2F926418888%3Fpq-origsite%3Dsummon>.

Ozanian, Mike. "MLB Worth $36 Billion As Team Values Hit Record $1.2 Billion Average." MLB Worth $36 Billion As Team Values Hit Record $1.2 Billion Average. Forbes, 25 Mar. 2015. Web. <http%3A%2F%2Fwww.forbes.com%2Fsites%2Fmikeozanian%2F2015%2F03%2F25%2Fmlb-worth-36-billion-as-team-values-hit-record-1-2-billion-average%2F>.


Umstead, Thomas R., and Mike Farrell. "Hindery Says 'YES' to Yankees Network." Hindery Says 'YES' to Yankees Network. Multichannel News, 17 Sept. 2001. Web. 5 Apr. 2015. <http%3A%2F%2Fsearch.proquest.com.libraryproxy.quinnipiac.edu%2Fdocview%2F219857835%3Fpq-origsite%3Dsummon>.

Should Student Athletes be Paid?

Should Student Athletes be Paid?



Last year, the NCAA took in nearly one billion in annual revenue according to Huffington Post (Maxwell Strachan). Can you imagine working for this company and not making a dime? Well this is how some people feel about college athletes. With March Madness just happening and a new football season right around the corner, hundreds of athletes will be interviewed, thousands of jerseys will be bought, and millions of photographs will make magazine headlines, all without NCAA college athletes making a single dollar in compensation. You may be asking where this money is going then.  According to the NCAA website, 90% of the money is going back to the student athletes whether it is through scholarships, championships, student assistant fund, academic enhancement fund, and student athlete services (ncaa.org). Whether or not student athletes should be paid lead to a poll by HuffPost determining, “only 30 percent of Americans favored the idea of paying student-athletes, while 44 percent were against the idea and 25 percent said they were not sure” (Maxwell Strachan). People who feel either they should or shouldn’t be paid feel extremely committed to their opinion, but as you can see many people are unsure how they feel about it. Any many of the people complaining aren’t even the college athletes themselves. When these athletes are superstars on their teams, most of the time they are on a full ride meaning all required expensies are provided by the University. This means meals, books, hosuing, and tuition. Of course not all student athletes are on these types of scholarships, because the school makes that decision. Before every single athlete enters the school, they know how much scholarship they are going to be on, and if they are not happy about it, they have th choice to do something else or go somewhere else. College athletics is a choice, and these athletes are just amateurs, once they get to the pros that is when they get paid. In the past few years, the NCAA has gotten much more strict in hopes that their athletes are actually becoming well-rounded students as well.
From personal experience, we are provided a few contracts at the beginning of each school year, stating that we will not receive any other compensation for our athletics besides our scholarship money. With all these rules changing, a few student athletes have decided to lash back. One important lawsuit was one concerning UCLA. According to The Hollywood Reporter In August, “a federal judge has ruled in favor of NCAA athletes including former UCLA basketball star Ed O'Bannon in allegations that the NCAA unlawfully restrains them from licensing their names and images in TV game telecasts and videogames. As a result of injunctions now issued, college athletes could be on the path towards being compensated for use of their likenesses (Eriq Gardner). Rather than athletes being paid for their playing, they are asking to just be paid for their status (jerseys sold, autographs, and photographs). Currently the NCAA still has rules prohibiting student athletes from making money off of these things, but the companies must get permission ahead of time. If enough athletes disagree to letting these companies use their name/picture/autograph, there could potentially be a big change in the industry. This wont necessary cause changes for the employees of the NCAA, but instead will compensate the athletes for their fame.
There are not many solutions to their issue without essentially abolishing the NCAA as a whole. As a non-profit organization, they need these athletes to make their money. If the athletes decided not to play, the NCAA would not be able to work. With the NCAA becoming stricter with their rules such as GPA requirements, student athletes are going to be coming out prepared for the real world, and not have to relay on their athletics. Many people still argue that the NCAA should be paying the athletes, while others say the full-tuition should be enough compensation.  Each athlete obviously has their own opinion, but according to CBS Sports’ article, NLRB Rules In Favor of College Athletes Players Association, “We frequently hear from student-athletes, across all sports, that they participate to enhance their overall college experience and for the love of their sport, not to be paid” (Tom Fornelli).  Student athletes are generally happy with the choice they have made to play their sport, and if they aren’t happy they 100% have the choice to not play it anymore, and if that means they cannot stay in school then that is a sacrifice that must be made. By paying college athletes we will make amateur athletes now professional ones, this will in the end not solve a thing.


Works Cited 
Fornelli, Tom. "NLRB Rules In Favor of College Athletes Players Association," CBS Sports 26 March 2014. Web.
Gardner, Eriq. "NCAA Athletes Win Antitrust Lawsuit That Could Pave Way for Pay." The Hollywood Reporter. N.p., 8 Aug. 2014. Web. 04 Apr. 2015.
"Should Student-Athletes Get Paid? | The 2-Minute Warning." YouTube. The Fumble, 27 Mar. 2015. Web. 05 Apr. 2015.
Strachan, Maxwell. "The NCAA Just Misses $1 Billion In Annual Revenue." The Huffington Post. TheHuffingtonPost.com, 11 Mar. 2015. Web. 04 Apr. 2015.

"Where the Money Goes." NCAA Home Page. N.p., 27 Nov. 2013. Web. 04 Apr. 2015.

Posted By: Christine Rochester

Are Sports Too Big To Fail?


Are Sports Too Big To Fail?



This week we are focusing on sports. In the worlds media industry this day in age sports is one of the most popular and largest money grossing type of media. As a huge sports fan most of my media consumption is sports and other sports related media. The sports industry is big money, and as sports fans we are willing to buy into these sports and pay to watch these athletes perform. According to Forbes, just in the MLB alone is worth 36 billion dollars. “The average baseball team is now worth $1.2 billion, 48% more than a year ago, the biggest year-over-year increase since we began tracking team values in 1998. A record 15 MLB teams are now worth at least $1 billion, up from five in 2014.”( Ozanian)  average salarys for pro players this in todays world are in the millions. According to Business Insider, “On average, NBA players make $5.15 million, MLB players make $3.2 million, NHL players make $2.4 million, and NFL players make $1.9 million per year.” (Manfred) The crazy part of this is that this isn’t even the most popular sport in America. The NFL today is Americas most popular American sport. This years super bowl commercials cost 4.5 million dollars per 30 seconds of air time. And as we know the super bowl commercials are one of the best parts of the super bowl.
            Now with sports being this huge in our media and entertainment world, we idolize athletes as heroes and icons. But as of recently there has been a disturbing trend arising in professional and college sports. Criminal activity has been a growing issue in professional sports. The NFL in particular has seen an increasing number of these cases in recent years. This year alone we have seen some of the most disturbing cases in recent history. Between the legal issues dealing with drugs, domestic violence, and child abuse the NFL has seen a huge jump in legal term oil this year. 
            Ravens Running back Ray Rice, is one of those in the spotlights for his actions. “Ray Rice received only a two-game suspension for knocking out his then-girlfriend (now wife) and dragging her unconscious body out of a hotel elevator.”(lund) For his actions Rice was only suspended two games. Now with this issue many people see that rice should have been removed from the league. But due to the NFL’s policy on domestic violence he was only suspended initially. but after extreme controversy, his sentence was that he was suspended from the league for even longer. A second example of legal issues in the NFL would be Adrian Petersons case. Peterson was charged with child abuse after he was exposed for beating or as he says “disciplining” one of his young sons. According to the New York Times, Peterson’s charges included, “Minnesota Vikings running back Adrian Peterson agreed to a plea bargain Tuesday, reducing his felony child-abuse charges to a single charge of reckless assault, a misdemeanor that comes with a $4,000 fine and an order to perform community service.” (Zinser)  Both of these cases were major headlines for the NFL this year, but were among numerous other offenses by players that raised the public’s eye.
            These issues bring me to my point of why do we continue to watch these sports if they are allowing players to commit such crimes and only be sentenced a few games and allowed to return. If these players were general people they would have extreme legal issues. Now does this say something about us as sports fans? Do we lack morals by still watching sports and cheering for teams even though their morals are against what is publicly and legally acceptable. I think Jeb Lund asks the perfect question, “Does watching the NFL make you evil?” By watching these sports that “allow” their athletes to almost get away with illegal activities, make us the viewers evil as well? By watching these sports does that make our morals as a society the same as these athletes who commit these offenses. If we as a society see these actions criminal and morally wrong why do we continue to watch? With these issues plaguing sports will we ever see a type of protest where people will stop supporting pro sports and their athletes? But the big question is that are sports to big in todays world that no matter what happens, with players and teams morally or even criminally, professional sports will never fail as a business and media source.     




Works Cited